BritishV8 Forum

General Category => Engine, Transmission, & Rear Axle assy. => Topic started by: NixVegaGT on November 02, 2007, 08:32:35 AM

Title: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 02, 2007, 08:32:35 AM
Nice article about your TR-6 shifter solution, Kris. That was good reading. That was a good solution for the shifter! That 5-speed sounds like the right combo for your six. That's the M77 right?? Or is it a T50 maybe?

My Vega came with a Saginaw-4. Not bad but I really wanted dog-rings, straight gears and better overdrive options. I couldn't find anyone making parts for the Saginaw. There are some pretty cool things you can do to a T5 for racing though. I think you've found a pretty smart solution to your needs.


I thought it warranted a new thread. SO transmission options: I've got some info about the T5's that might be helpful. As for the T5 there are some questions I had about the TR-6: I was thinking about the shifter location. This is also a problem with the Vega. How far from the bellhousing is the shifter location for the TR-6?

The T5's have three shifter locations: GM S10 (right near the main housing), GM F-body (at the end of the tailhousing), Ford... well every other T5 (about 3/4 back on the tailhousing). It is possible to build a World Class version of the T5 using anyone of these tailhousings...

The T5 is not the cheapest solution. It is light and plentiful though.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on November 04, 2007, 11:48:41 PM
Quote: "That 5-speed sounds like the right combo for your six. That's the M77 right?? Or is it a T50 maybe?"

To be honest, I don't know Rover transmissions well. I bought it off the net from a guy who raced 215/Rover-equipped TR7s. He said it was a TR8 gearbox. One of the shifter remote ears was broken off, so I bought a back case half from somebody else on the net. The back case half came from a TR7 5-speed as I recall--been a few years.

Quote: "I thought it warranted a new thread. SO transmission options: I've got some info about the T5's that might be helpful. As for the T5 there are some questions I had about the TR-6: I was thinking about the shifter location. This is also a problem with the Vega. How far from the bellhousing is the shifter location for the TR-6?"

The stock 4-speed 'box has the shifter 23 inches back from the engine side of the bellhousing. The shortened TR8 remote I made puts the lever 23-1/2 inches back from the engine side of the TR8 bellhousing.

I thought about a T5 but then I saw this TR8 'box on the net. What I'd read about the TR8 gearboxes was that they shifted well. The gear ratios seemed good for my TR's 3.7:1 rearend too. As I mentioned in another post, I'm thinking about getting a Muncie so I can drop my NOS '66 Hurst 4-speed into it. As Curtis noted, that's really a step backwards, but man this Hurst shifter is killer cool. Having that muscle-car era shifter with its white 4-speed knob protruding from the floor of the '6 would be mighty rad....

Kris
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 07, 2007, 08:41:48 AM
Sounds like you found the right option for you. I know what you mean about the "Rock Crusher" sound. I love it. I'm actually building my race T5 with straight gears. I just ordered the kit yesterday. Here's a pic of the kit
T5-STRAIGHTCUT_lg.jpg
inter_lg.jpg

That should make some noise, and use less power. I picked 2.94, 1.94, 1.34, 1.00 ratios in gears 1 thru 4. I might just use the stock overdrive ratio for cruising. I'd likely not need it for power... I'm pretty excited about getting started on building it...
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on November 07, 2007, 05:16:23 PM
Kit looks great. That should be a fun winter project.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: jbarila on November 08, 2007, 09:50:43 AM
Does anyone have a good picture or could take one of a T5 for the forum.
I'm looking for one of the shift fork arrangement on the top cover. What I need is the top cover removed, layed on it's back to show the arrangement of the forks and shaft.
Thanks if anyone can supply it. My manual just does'nt have a good pic.
JB
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 08, 2007, 09:10:34 PM
If it doesn't happen before I get my WC T5 I'll get some pix for that...
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: Greg55_99 on November 08, 2007, 10:02:19 PM
May be overkill..  Toyota Supra Turbo R154 mated to a Buick 215 bellhousing via a Jeep AX15 adapter from Novak in Utah.

(http://www.jeeps-offroad.com/attachments/tech-articles/2923d1101491462-engine-swap-bellhousings-215_r154_32.jpg)

Greg
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: BearoylRacing on November 09, 2007, 02:07:51 PM
I'm in the planning stage for building an MGBGT using a 3.9 Rover motor.  This car will be "street legal" but used primarily for hill climb races in the northwest.  I just signed up to the forum and what I see on transmissions is that the T5, with straight cut close ratio gears, may be the best choice for my purposes.  Compared to the other options, is this a relatively light gearbox?  Any comments/suggestions are greatly appreciated!  Bob Sherman, Hillsboro, Oregon
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 09, 2007, 02:55:19 PM
Pretty HOT, Greg. That's a pretty stout transmission. Is the input shaft long enough for the adapter plate?

I don't know much about the R154 so I can't comment on the weight. I've heard it's pretty tough though. As for the T5: It's VERY light. 75lbs. That's at least 15lbs lighter than my Saginaw 4 I think. I'll double check that tonight. I know the Muncie T10 in the aluminum cases were pretty light at about 70lbs. AT least I know Richmond gear makes a 70lb. version of the T10 patterned after the original aluminum T10s...

Here's a link to the company I bought the straight-cut dog-ring gear set from for my T5:

http://www.gforcetransmissions.com/tran_gt-5.asp

Hang on to your wallets! LOL. I think the price is worth it for a light racing 5-speed. Especially if you are making power in a light vehicle where weight is a serious consideration. (Well to be honest, weight is ALWAYS a consideration to me.) Hope this helps, Bob.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: Moderator on November 09, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
The weight I've seen listed for Toyota five speeds was 35kg... which comes to about 77 pounds. That's probably within the margin of error (wet vs. dry, with shifter vs. without, etc.) It's hard to know how different people weight stuff! The Tremec TKO-600 is a heavier duty version of the T5... and heavier weight too, at about 95 pounds. The Tremec T56 is 6-speed is way too heavy, at about 125 pounds.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: Greg55_99 on November 09, 2007, 09:38:28 PM
The R154 and adapter work just fine with the 215 bell.  Input shaft length is no problem.

Greg
Buick_R154.jpg
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: BearoylRacing on November 12, 2007, 02:08:32 PM
Thanks for the info!  Those g force gears look great!  Bob
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: BlownMGB-V8 on November 13, 2007, 12:31:05 AM
Have they had any breakage problems with the shifter dogs? The ones on the upper gears look a little weak.

Jim
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 13, 2007, 11:21:57 AM
I've been researching for a month or two and I haven't ran into complaints of dog breakage... I'd take that with a grain of salt though. It is a T5 in the end. They are a pretty light trans... I've read of a number of road racers using with luck though... One thing I haven't found is used G-force gear boxes so they are either too good to sell or frag beyond all recognition. LOL! I'm not close to worried about it for my application:

2300 lb. Vega. 355 lb/ft torque if I'm lucky... You guys will be the first to know if it does break though. Unfortunately the soonest I'll be testing it is in a year... SHOOT!
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 14, 2007, 12:10:35 AM
I forgot to mention that I weighed the Saginaw 4 and it came out to 105 lbs.! That's a weight savings of 30 lbs. I was pretty surprised that it was that heavy actually. That's a big step for overall weight reduction...
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on November 16, 2007, 02:38:15 PM
SWEET! I just won an auction for a WC T-5 from a '90 V6 Camaro. It has the smaller 14-spline input shaft for the 4cyl and V6 cars but has the WC internals. Should work great with the G-force upgrade!
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on November 30, 2007, 10:09:53 AM
Here's some fun.... I hunted down a '62 Special 4-speed, which I hope I can mate to my NOS Hurst shifter. Doesn't feel any heavier than the Rover 'box and the shift lever emerges in precisely the right spot (with the stock lever). I'll finish building my TR with the Rover and rebuild this unit as a side project for a future date. Always love taking something crusty, yanking it apart, bead blasting, cleaning, painting, and producing something that looks nearly new.

More detailed writeup on the expedition to retrieve it, here: http://www.startribune.com/blogs/classiccars/?p=104
PB290247.jpg
PB290250.jpg
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: BlownMGB-V8 on December 01, 2007, 04:18:41 PM
That would be the Saginaw 4 speed. A good reliable box that'll handle some big inch motors. Very similar to the Muncie but heavier with that cast iron case. It is possible to fit the overdrive from the 3 speed Saginaw to it if you can find one.

But make sure of the ID first. It seems like maybe the Saginaw had all three levers on the side cover.

Jim
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on December 01, 2007, 09:12:16 PM
It's a Borg Warner T10, which is different from a Saginaw as I understand it. Pictures I've looked at seem to show the Saginaw being cast iron throughout, and bigger and heavier. The T-10 has a cast iron case (early on; aluminum later) and an aluminum tail housing. It was continued on as the Super T-10, with Saginaw and Muncie used concurrently.

Good tip on possible overdrive. I'm interested in that for highway cruising, though part of my nostalgic reason for picking up this 'box was to see if I can fit my NOS Hurst shifter to it. That is built for the Saginaw, but it looks like the shifters are similar and I'm hoping I can combine the Hurst shifter with the T10 linkage.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: hoffbug on December 01, 2007, 09:37:25 PM
Hey Chris. Thats a nice article.
 Id like to get back to Rohners some day. I have been through French lake many times. I found a new place in Iowa last October but did not have much time to go through it.

You, Nic, and I should get together sometime.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on December 01, 2007, 11:54:46 PM
If it involves traipsing through wrecking yards hunting for cool old parts that will go on our V8-powered Brits, you can count me in!

I'm looking for a flywheel inspection cover for the 198/215 bellhousing; I'm sure we could each come up with something cool that would provide a salvage-yard roadtrip excuse....

Kris
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: BlownMGB-V8 on December 02, 2007, 10:34:17 AM
I think you are right about the T-10. They were not common as a GM transmission, much more common in Fords. In fact I don't think I ever saw one for a GM before. They used an identical shifter to the Muncie and the only difference for the Saginaw was the longer control rod for reverse, so any shifter for one will fit the others.

On that overdrive, it was different from what we see nowadays. To upshift you would let off the gas and then step on it again lightly and to downshift you'd stomp the pedal and sometimes that didn't work. It also freewheeled on coast and I don't remember if it did that in all gears or not, it may have. It's been 35 years since I drove one.

Jim
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on December 02, 2007, 05:08:24 PM
Yeah. The Saginaw4 has the reverse in the side cover. It sure looks like a T10 to me. I didn't know they sold specials with manual. It makes sense though since it was an econocar.

I think a trip to salvage would be awesome! I got my 7.5" rear for my Vega from French lake. Nice guys. A big selection just laying around in the weeds. LOL!

What do you know about the one in Iowa, Tony?
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: hoffbug on December 06, 2007, 09:14:29 PM
NixVegaGT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> What do you know about the one in Iowa, Tony?

 Only that the guy didnt have any H-body stuff. He is a bit of a Ford guy and has an orignial Boss 429 in his private collection. I was told that there was a cosworth there biut it had been sold.
It was getting dark and I didnt have time to look the yard over thoroughly.
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on December 06, 2007, 11:05:31 PM
A reader of my Star Tribune blog highly praised a Grand Forks yard called Weekly's. Anybody heard of that?

I have no idea where Grand Forks is, but it's close to the MN border isn't it?

Be fun to find a yard with classics that isn't on the net. More cool stuff may as yet be undiscovered.

Another yard I've heard of--it might be in Hanover, MN--is mainly British stuff.

That could be cool too.  Here's some parts I'd like to score--215 drive shaft, V8 badge from early '60s Olds, windshield washer with working pump, late '60s-early '70s AM/FM radio with pushbuttons, Olds air intake badge (the ring that sits in the top piece, stock shift ball from Olds/Buick '62-'63 4-Speed.

Kris
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: NixVegaGT on December 07, 2007, 08:11:17 AM
I haven't heard of that one. Grand Forks is right on the ND/MN border. They aren't on the web? Huh. I haven't been to Windy Hill for a long time. They had a pretty picked over group of Monzas and Vegas. (That's what I was looking for) It's a pretty big place though. May be more classic British stuff. I'll give them a call and see.

If we plan a trip to Grand Forks we could pop by there on the way...
Title: Re: Transmission options
Post by: motormouth on December 07, 2007, 11:01:12 AM
I stopped by Windy Hill looking for my 215 V8 a number of years ago. They had two, I believe, one without intake and one a two barrel with one or both of the heads unbolted. At least in the area I was looking, the cars were well picked over.

Yards don't always know everything they have, though. The engine I scored from Rohner's was in a car at the side of the yard, down a hill--not by the other Specials and Skylarks they had grouped.

French Lake has buildings and buses and trailers full of parts and I'm sure a lot of that stuff is not inventoried. There's probably a stickshift bellhousing at Rohner's and French Lake, hidden somewhere.... I missed one in an Olds wagon I'd walked by many times because it was a three-on-the-tree. Only when I saw the engine gone did I look closer and see three pedals. Doh!